Журнал Витуса. Голосов: 2 Адрес блога: http://vitus-wagner.livejournal.com/ Добавлен: 2008-02-19 12:48:41 блограйдером Lurk

Индекс обитаемости

2015-10-07 10:24:05 (читать в оригинале)

Тут в университете штата Вашингтон сочинили методику расчета индекса обитаемости экзопланет.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.08922

Exoplanet habitability is traditionally assessed by comparing a planet's semi-major axis to the location of its host star's "habitable zone," the shell around a star for which Earth-like planets can possess liquid surface water. The Kepler space telescope has discovered numerous planet candidates near the habitable zone, and many more are expected from missions such as K2, TESS and PLATO. These candidates often require significant follow-up observations for validation, so prioritizing planets for habitability from transit data has become an important aspect of the search for life in the universe. We propose a method to compare transiting planets for their potential to support life based on transit data, stellar properties and previously reported limits on planetary emitted flux. For a planet in radiative equilibrium, the emitted flux increases with eccentricity, but decreases with albedo. As these parameters are often unconstrained, there is an "eccentricity-albedo degeneracy" for the habitability of transiting exoplanets. Our method mitigates this degeneracy, includes a penalty for large-radius planets, uses terrestrial mass-radius relationships, and, when available, constraints on eccentricity to compute a number we call the "habitability index for transiting exoplanets" that represents the relative probability that an exoplanet could support liquid surface water. We calculate it for Kepler Objects of Interest and find that planets that receive between 60-90% of the Earth's incident radiation, assuming circular orbits, are most likely to be habitable. Finally, we make predictions for the upcoming TESS and JWST missions.

Сразу возникает вопрос о том - обитаемость ДЛЯ КОГО? Если бы речь шла об обитаемости для людей, в смысле ранжирования целей для экспедиций по поиску потенциальных колоний, выбранная методика была бы более-менее осмыслена.

А так - ну что мы знаем о том, какая бывает внеземная жизнь? Может вообще надо не землеподобные планеты искать, а титаноподобные, или европоподобные, поскольку там вероятность жизни много выше.

This entry was originally posted at http://vitus-wagner.dreamwidth.org/1126288.html. Please comment there using OpenID. Now there are comments