by: Alexandra Bruce

Raytheon’s Top People Tied to the Global Hawk Remote-Controlled UAV Aircraft Systems, All Died on 9/11

What this piece is generally positing is that it was a decommissioned, retrofitted Douglas A3 Skywarrior attack jet, armed with a missile, which impacted with the Pentagon on 9/11 – and that coincidentally, 5 top officials and engineers from Raytheon happened to be on 3 of the 4 doomed flights and were killed, on that day.

Oops! Surveillance Video from 9/11 that the Government Doesn’t Want You to See

Douglas A3 Skywarrior Retrofitted with Raytheon Missile

All of the murdered men were either directly or administratively involved with the nascent drone program; i.e., the controlling of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for uses on the battlefield, which have increasingly become the signature of American battle tactics since the start of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars and have since spread out to include Yemen, Pakistan and even home sweet home, in the streets of the good ol’ USA.

Those involved with the most recent generation of drones, working for Raytheon and killed on that that terrible day include: 1) Stanley Hall, Director of Electronic Warfare Program Management (American #77); 2) Peter Gay, VP of Electronic Systems, on Special Assignment, at the El Segundo, California Division Office, where the Global Hawk UAV Remote Control System is made (American #11); 3) Kenneth Waldie, Senior Quality Control Engineer for Electronic Systems (American #11); 4) David Kovalsin, Senior Mechanical Engineer for Electronic Systems (American #11); and 5) Herbert Homer, Corporate Executive, working at the Department of Defense (United #175).

To be certain, it was not AA Flight #77 which crashed into the Pentagon (this clip doesn’t even go into the physical impossibility of such an assertion), a lie which has been perpetrated by the US Government as the truth, when anyone with half a brain could easily see that this is a straight-up lie. It is a lie that is dangerous to the security of the US; security which has clearly been compromised by the villains who have owned and administrated our government for at least 13 years now.

===

RESPONSE of 9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK RESEARCHER, BARBARA HONEGGER:

Hi, Alexandra –

…I’m aware of the A-3 Skywarrior- and-Global-Hawk-drone-remote-control thesis, which I included in my ‘Pentagon Attack Papers’ published as early as 2002.

This could have been the white drone that was destroyed at/near the [Pentagon] heliport at 9:32:30.

The problem with the addition of a missile, regardless of the aircraft/platform from which it might have been launched, however, is that once entering the hardened outside wall, which it could do, it would penetrate in a straight line, but there are multiple still-standing inside columns in all possible straight-line paths between the alleged impact point on the outer wall and the alleged ‘exit’ hole on the inside of the third-in C Ring. Also, a missile simply couldn’t have the speed and force to have cut the almost perfectly round hole in the inside of the steel-reinforced-concrete C Ring wall and come to an abrupt stop in mid air, which it would had to have done as there is no damage let alone penetration on the outside wall of the fourth-in B Ring which is only 25 feet beyond the alleged C Ring ‘exit’ hole across the open driveway in between.

Any missile, unless it exploded shortly after entering the outside E Ring, is thus not possible, and if it did explode just inside the E Ring, it could not then have created the ‘exit’ hole in the C Ring two rings further in, so either way a missile can’t account for the internal damage. The A-3 Skywarrior thesis must therefore be separated from the additional missile thesis. Also, the video wrongly states that the alleged impact hole is 16 feet wide. This is provably untrue, as the attached photo clearly shows: the only ‘hole’ is the horizontal opening on the ground floor that is six columns wide, or c. 60 feet. (These claims of an alleged 16-foot hole refer to the blackened areas to the left and right of the ‘T’ on the second floor, but the vertical of this ‘T’ is the still-intact second floor column between these missing windows and so is not a ‘hole’ at all.) But it is physically impossible for a 757 to have flown low enough to have made the 60-foot ground floor opening and its engines without it’s immense engines which hang down below the wings gouging the lawn, which no engines did — the lawn outside that alleged impact point is pristine…
Barbara’

===

Edited Transcript of the Voiceover:

According to two civilian defense contractor employees working at commercial corporate facilities at Fort Collins’ Loveland Municipal Airport, in the months before the September 11th attacks, US Air Force defense contractors brought in A3 Skywarrior aircraft under cover of darkness to be completely retrofitted and modified at this small civilian airport in Colorado.

The two witnesses say that separate military contractor teams, working independently, at different times and retrofitted A3 Skywarriors with updated missiles, missile control systems; Raytheon’s Global Hawk, the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with remote control systems, engines, transponders and radar navigation systems.

This was alleged for use as a simple Missile-testing platform for the defense contractor, Hughes-Raytheon

The employees asked not to be identified for personal safety and fear of job retaliation but both said the Air Force brought in separate teams for Top Secret military work, related to commercial aviation, at this airport.

They were told not to discuss what they had seen with anyone, under strict orders not to discuss what the military teams were doing or what they saw.

The witnesses were fearful due to several recent suicides: car wrecks, mysterious deaths, directly related to the mediation experts working on the systems that were installed on the A3, as having breached the government-blocked information flow, at great personal risk.

Small plane evidence was moved at the Pentagon. The approximate 16-foot entry hole, at the outside façade at the Pentagon, on 9/11 is more likely to have been caused by an air-to-ground missile, fired from a small military jet, rather than an impact from a much larger Boeing 757.

Some reasons cited to support a missile hole include

* evidence that the wings and rear stabilizer caused virtually no damage to the outside walls and windows, at point of impact.

* No significant 757 interior or exterior parts were found at the scene,